Key result
Application of the 2012 Dutch cardiovascular risk management guideline revision resulted in 20.0% of patients shifting risk category and 12.0% shifting drug recommendations compared to the 2006 version.
Why the study?
Does the revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline from 2006 to 2012 change cardiovascular risk classification and drug recommendations in primary prevention patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,248)
Yes
Does the revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline from 2006 to 2012 change cardiovascular risk classification and drug recommendations in primary prevention patients?
Revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline led to a change in risk category for 20% of patients and altered drug recommendations for 12%, highlighting the clinical impact of guideline updates.
Guideline revisions may reclassify patients and alter therapy; leaves open effects on outcomes or adherence.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines and accompanying risk charts concerning cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) are regularly revised worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline has led to the reclassification of patients and, accordingly, to changes in drug recommendations. METHODS: All medical records (year 2011) of patients aged 40-65 years with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs, were selected from the Registration Network of General Practices associated with Leiden University Medical Center. Multiple imputation techniques for missing determinants were used. The individual cardiovascular risk was calculated and the resulting drug recommendation was assessed according to both the 2006 and 2012 versions of the guideline. RESULTS: In total, 2075 patients were selected, of whom 1248 fulfilled the guideline criteria (systolic blood pressure 115-180 mmHg and total cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio 3.5-8). According to the 2012 guideline, 58.2% of the patients had low risk and 249 patients (20.0%) shifted to a different risk category. For 150 of these patients (12.0%), this category shift implied a shift in drug recommendation. The probability of shifting in drug recommendation increased with increasing age, cholesterol level, and blood pressure, and by being male. CONCLUSION: Guideline revision may have important implications: based on identical values for risk factors, according to the latest revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline 20% of patients shifted in risk category and 12% of the patients shifted in drug recommendation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luymes et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk management (n=1,248). 2012 Dutch CVRM guideline revision vs. 2006 Dutch CVRM guideline was evaluated on Shift in risk category. Application of the 2012 Dutch cardiovascular risk management guideline revision resulted in 20.0% of patients shifting risk category and 12.0% shifting drug recommendations compared to the 2006 version.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: