Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Osteogenic responses of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) were compared on square-patterned, inverse square-patterned, and planar titanium, chromium, diamond-like carbon (DLC), and tantalum; hypothesis was that both the materials and patterns affect osteogenesis. Samples were produced using photolithography and physical vapor deposition. Early-marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and mid-markers, small body size and mothers against decapentaplegic-related protein-1 (SMAD1), runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), and osteopontin were studied using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. ALP and hydroxyapatite, were colorimetrically studied. ALP reached highest values on both patterned titanium samples, but mid-markers disclosed that it was already lagging behind planar and inverse patterned tantalum. Hydroxyapatite formation disclosed that osteo-induced hMSCs passed all the differentiation stages (except on planar chromium). Presence of hydroxyapatite disclosed that both types of patterning promoted (p < 0.001) osteogenesis compared to planar samples. Results suggest that the osseocompatibility/integration of implants could be improved by changing the monotonous and featureless implant-host interface into micro-patterned interface to provide physical differentiation cues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaivosoja et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: