Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human aldose reductase and aldehyde reductase are members of the aldo-keto reductase superfamily that share three domains of homology and a nonhomologous COOH-terminal region. The two enzymes catalyze the NADPH-dependent reduction of a wide variety of carbonyl compounds. To probe the function of the domains and investigate the basis for substrate specificity, we interchanged cDNA fragments encoding the NH2-terminal domains of aldose and aldehyde reductase. A chimeric enzyme (CH1, 317 residues) was constructed in which the first 71 residues of aldose reductase were replaced with first 73 residues of aldehyde reductase. Catalytic effectiveness (kcat/Km) of CH1 for the reduction of various substrates remained virtually identical to wild-type aldose reductase, changing a maximal 4-fold. Deletion of the 13-residue COOH-terminal end of aldose reductase, yielded a mutant enzyme (AR delta 303-315) with markedly decreased catalytic effectiveness for uncharged substrates ranging from 80- to more than 600-fold (average 300-fold). The KmNADPH of CH1 and AR delta 303-315 were nearly identical to that of the wild-type enzyme indicating that cofactor binding is unaffected. The truncated AR delta 303-315 displayed a NADPH/D isotope effect in kcat and an increased D(kcat/Km) value for DL-glyceraldehyde, suggesting that hydride transfer has become partially rate-limiting for the overall reaction. We conclude that the COOH-terminal domain of aldose reductase is crucial to the proper orientation of substrates in the active site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohren et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: