Key result
The permutation approach provided a more parsimonious representation of discretized dynamic patterns compared to binning, better highlighting physiologically meaningful patterns such as reduced cardiorespiratory complexity during paced breathing.
Why the study?
To compare different discretization approaches for the model-free estimation of information-theoretic measures of dynamic coupling between short realizations of random processes.
Permutation-based discretization provides a more parsimonious and effective representation than binning for estimating information-theoretic measures of dynamic coupling in short physiological time series.
May refine cardiorespiratory complexity assessment in research; leaves open validation before clinical use.
This work presents a comparison between different approaches for the model-free estimation of information-theoretic measures of the dynamic coupling between short realizations of random processes. The measures considered are the mutual information rate (MIR) between two random processes X and Y and the terms of its decomposition evidencing either the individual entropy rates of X and Y and their joint entropy rate, or the transfer entropies from X to Y and from Y to X and the instantaneous information shared by X and Y. All measures are estimated through discretization of the random variables forming the processes, performed either via uniform quantization (binning approach) or rank ordering (permutation approach). The binning and permutation approaches are compared on simulations of two coupled non-identical Hènon systems and on three datasets, including short realizations of cardiorespiratory (CR, heart period and respiration flow), cardiovascular (CV, heart period and systolic arterial pressure), and cerebrovascular (CB, mean arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity) measured in different physiological conditions, i.e., spontaneous vs paced breathing or supine vs upright positions. Our results show that, with careful selection of the estimation parameters (i.e., the embedding dimension and the number of quantization levels for the binning approach), meaningful patterns of the MIR and of its components can be achieved in the analyzed systems. On physiological time series, we found that paced breathing at slow breathing rates induces less complex and more coupled CR dynamics, while postural stress leads to unbalancing of CV interactions with prevalent baroreflex coupling and to less complex pressure dynamics with preserved CB interactions. These results are better highlighted by the permutation approach, thanks to its more parsimonious representation of the discretized dynamic patterns, which allows one to explore interactions with longer memory while limiting the curse of dimensionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barà et al. (2023) studied Healthy (physiological variability) (n=47). Permutation-based discretization vs. Binning-based discretization was evaluated on Mutual Information Rate (MIR) and its decomposition terms. The permutation approach provided a more parsimonious representation of discretized dynamic patterns compared to binning, better highlighting physiologically meaningful patterns such as reduced cardiorespiratory complexity during paced breathing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: