ESPITE the mos t diligent a t ten t ion to asepsis during any surgical procedure, pos topera t ive infection remains a threat . The magni tude of this problem on the Neurosurgical Service a t the U C L A Center for the Hea l th Sciences is the subject of this report . This s tudy was undert aken to provide the surgeon with a clear idea of the infection rate so t ha t techniques of asepsis could be be t te r eva lua ted and to provide a basis for discussion of risks of a surgical procedure with pa t ien ts and their families. An a t t e m p t was made to determine the total incidence of infections t ha t developed in clean operat ive wounds. The na ture of the various factors which m a y lead to infection were examined, and the incidence of infection was related to specific neurosurgical procedures. There are ample reports concerning the general surgical experience with this problem; however, neurosurgical repor ts are less abundant . Woodhall , et al., 12 repor ted their experience with 4~ infections in 3,019 operations over a 10-year period. In addit ion, they summarized the reported experience of Cairns, 3 Pennybacker , 1~ and Penfield2 These rates varied f rom a low of 0.69% (5,066 operations) to a high of 4.4cflv (1,169 operations). A more recent repor t n described an unusual ly high incidence (10.~%) of infectious complications. In addit ion to these specific reports, infection has been included among complications in published reports of specific neurosurgical operat ions 2,5,6,s or neurosurgical infection by a specific bacterial organism. 1,4
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. E. Balch (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: