Key result
Post-myocardial infarction men exhibited significantly higher metabolic equivalents during an incremental shuttle walking test at 1.12 to 4.16 mph compared to non-cardiac men (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Are metabolic equivalents during a shuttle walking test different between post-myocardial infarction patients and non-cardiac subjects?
Observational (n=50)
Are metabolic equivalents during a shuttle walking test different between post-myocardial infarction patients and non-cardiac subjects?
p-value: p=<0.001
Post-myocardial infarction patients exhibit higher metabolic equivalents during walking compared to healthy individuals, indicating that standard MET values derived from healthy populations may not be accurate for prescribing exercise in cardiac rehabilitation.
Questions applicability of healthy-derived METs to post-MI patients; hypothesis-generating cross-sectional observation requiring prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Comorbidities are found to affect metabolic equivalents (METs). Therefore the main objective of this study was to compare METs (1 MET: oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) 3.5 ml/kg/min) during an incremental shuttle walking test (SWT) between non-cardiac and post-myocardial infarction (MI) men, and secondly to determine any differences in Vo(2) (ml/kg/min) between flat treadmill walking and the turning during the shuttle walking in non-cardiac subjects. DESIGN: Comparative study. SUBJECTS: Thirty one post-MI (mean (SD) age 63.5 (6.5), range 53-77 years) from phase IV cardiac rehabilitation and 19 non-cardiac (64.6 (7.5), range 51-76 years) men participated. METHODS: All subjects performed an SWT, and non-cardiac subjects a treadmill test of similar protocol. Throughout both, the subject's Vo(2) was measured. RESULTS: Analysis comparing lines of regression showed METs at 1.12 to 4.16 mph were higher (p<0.001) for post-MIs versus non-cardiac subjects. For non-cardiac subjects, there were no differences between the treadmill test and SWT (p>0.9) and LoA showed acceptable agreement in METs between treadmill vs SWT, mean difference -1.1 (8.8) (1.96SD). CONCLUSION: It would appear that for asymptomatic individuals it is appropriate to apply established METs for flat walking to the SWT. However, the significantly higher METs for the post-MI compared with the non-cardiac subjects indicates the need for caution when using METs derived from healthy subjects in the prescription of exercise for myocardial patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woolf‐May et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Post-myocardial infarction (n=50). Post-myocardial infarction vs. Non-cardiac subjects was evaluated on Metabolic equivalents (METs) during an incremental shuttle walking test (p=<0.001). Post-myocardial infarction men exhibited significantly higher metabolic equivalents during an incremental shuttle walking test at 1.12 to 4.16 mph compared to non-cardiac men (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: