Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which there are systematic differences between UK and US accounting principles likely to give rise to significant quantitative differences in earnings and assessments of comparative corporate performance. The results of the empirical analysis provide evidence of a systematically more conservative bias in earnings measurement under US accounting principles. The most frequently occurring differences were found to be those dealing with amortisation of goodwill and with provision for deferred taxation. However, the dominant effect on earnings was accounted for by the different treatment of goodwill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weetman et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: