Key result
Endovascular treatment and lumbar spinal drainage for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with neurogenic pulmonary edema resulted in good recovery or moderate disability in 7 of 12 patients.
Why the study?
Does endovascular embolization followed by lumbar spinal drainage improve clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe neurogenic pulmonary edema?
Observational (n=12)
Does endovascular embolization followed by lumbar spinal drainage improve clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe neurogenic pulmonary edema?
Endovascular treatment followed by lumbar spinal drainage may be a viable treatment option for severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage complicated by neurogenic pulmonary edema.
AIM: Severe neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) can occur in a variety of brain insults, including subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and severe case of NPE can cause devastating consequences. But the literature on the treatment strategy about aneurysmal SAH with NPE is very scant. We present that SAH patients with severe NPE, who were treated first by embolization of aneurysm followed by insertion of lumbar spinal drainage, had comparatively good outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present 12 consecutive cases of aneurysmal SAH with NPE in the acute stage, which were treated by endovascular treatment between April 2002 and December 2012. We classified the patients according to the Hunt and Hess grading system as follows: grade-3 (1 patient), grade-4 (4 patients), and grade-5 (7 patients). All patients needed respiratory management, with the assistance of a ventilator, and underwent endovascular treatment for the ruptured aneurysms within 72 hours from onset. For all the patients, immediately after the endovascular treatment, we performed lumbar spinal drainage. RESULTS: The pulmonary edema disappeared rapidly after respiratory management and endovascular treatment. The outcomes were as follows: good recovery (GR; 3 patients), moderate disability (MD; 4 patients), severe disability (SD; 3 patients), and death (D; 2 patients). Five patients (42%) developed pneumonia, and we postponed extubation until recovery from pneumonia. The cause for severe disability and death was symptomatic vasospasm and primary brain damage. No patients had rebleeding from ruptured aneurysms. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for ruptured aneurysm and placement of lumbar spinal drainage is an excellent treatment option for severe SAH with NPE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meguro et al. (2015) conducted an observational in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with neurogenic pulmonary edema (n=12). Endovascular treatment and lumbar spinal drainage was evaluated on Clinical outcome (recovery, disability, or death). Endovascular treatment and lumbar spinal drainage for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with neurogenic pulmonary edema resulted in good recovery or moderate disability in 7 of 12 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: