Key result
This is a study protocol to assess the feasibility, reliability, and accuracy of the Femom wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device compared to computerized cardiotocography, and no results are reported.
Why the study?
Computerised cardiotocography is limited to the hospital setting, prompting assessment of a novel wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device designed for home fetal heart rate monitoring.
Does the femom wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device provide accurate and reliable fetal heart rate monitoring compared to standard computerised cardiotocography in high-risk pregnancies?
Cohort
Does the femom wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device provide accurate and reliable fetal heart rate monitoring compared to standard computerised cardiotocography in high-risk pregnancies?
This study protocol describes a pilot prospective cohort study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a novel wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device compared to standard cardiotocography.
Results from this protocol are pending; leaves open accuracy of wireless fetal ECG versus cardiotocography in high-risk pregnancies.
INTRODUCTION: Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is a vital aspect of fetal well-being assessment, and the current method of computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) is limited to the hospital setting. Non-invasive fetal ECG (NIFECG) has the ability to produce FHR patterns through R wave detection while eliminating confusion with maternal heart rate, but is presently limited to research use. Femom is a novel wireless NIFECG device that is designed to be placed without professional assistance, while connecting to mobile applications. It has the ability to achieve home FHR monitoring thereby allowing more frequent monitoring, earlier detection of deterioration, while reducing hospital attendances. This study aims to assess the feasibility, reliability, and accuracy of femom (NIFECG) by comparing its outputs to cCTG monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: weeks' gestation who require antenatal cCTG monitoring for any clinical indication are eligible for recruitment. Concurrent NIFECG and cCTG monitoring will take place for up to 60 min. NIFECG signals will be postprocessed to produce FHR outputs such as baseline FHR and short-term variation (STV). Signal acceptance criteria is set as <50% of signal loss for the trace duration. Correlation, precision and accuracy studies will be performed to compare the STV and baseline FHR values produced by both devices. The impact of maternal and fetal characteristics on the effectiveness of both devices will be investigated. Other non-invasive electrophysiological assessment parameters will be assessed for its correlation with the STV, ultrasound assessments and maternal and fetal risk factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from South-East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 02 and MHRA. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04941534.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in High-risk pregnancies. Femom (wireless non-invasive fetal ECG) vs. Computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) was evaluated on Feasibility, reliability, and accuracy of femom (NIFECG) compared to cCTG monitoring (STV and baseline FHR). This is a study protocol to assess the feasibility, reliability, and accuracy of the Femom wireless non-invasive fetal ECG device compared to computerized cardiotocography, and no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: