Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoactive peptide that has been reported to cause lung edema. This study tested if the edemagenic effect of ET-1 is due to preferential venoconstriction and, if so, whether the site of resistance is similar with salt solution (PSS) and more physiologic blood perfusate. ET-1 caused concentration-dependent contraction of pulmonary arterial and venous rings, with an EC50 of 1.3 nM in artery and 0.6 nM in vein (p less than 0.05). In PSS-perfused lungs, 5 nM ET-1 caused a 7.0 +/- 0.8 torr pressor response that was associated with a 5.0 +/- 0.3 torr increase in microvascular pressure and a 530 +/- 20 mg increase in lung weight within 10 min. In contrast, KCl-treated lungs had an equivalent pressor response (7.4 +/- 1.1 torr), yet the microvascular pressure increased by only 2.5 +/- 0.4 torr (p less than 0.05 from ET-1) and the lung weight was unchanged. Meclofenamate did not prevent the effect of ET-1 on microvascular pressure or lung weight. In blood-perfused lungs, ET-1 caused a 7.3 +/- 0.1 torr pressor response but only a 2.0 +/- 0.5 torr increase in microvascular pressure and no increase in lung weight. ET-1 had no effect on permeability either of cultured endothelial cell monolayers or in the pulmonary microvasculature in vivo. We conclude that the edemagenic effect of ET-1 in PSS-perfused lungs is mediated through venoconstriction and an increase in microvascular pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodman et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: