Key result
In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, atorvastatin 80 mg daily did not cause left ventricular mass regression or improvements in diastolic function compared to placebo over 12 months.
Why the study?
Does atorvastatin reduce left ventricular mass in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
RCT (n=22)
Double-blind
1:1
No
Does atorvastatin reduce left ventricular mass in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, high-dose atorvastatin does not induce regression of left ventricular mass or improve diastolic function, confirming previous negative trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-dose atorvastatin should not be used to regress left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; confirms prior negative trials.
Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), characterized by a thickened, fibrotic myocardium, remains the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Based on animal and clinical data, we hypothesized that atorvastatin would induce left ventricular (LV) mass regression.Methods: Statin Induced Regression of Cardiomyopathy Trial (SIRCAT) was a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The primary endpoint was change in LV mass measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 12 months after treatment with once-daily atorvastatin 80 mg or placebo. A key secondary endpoint was diastolic dysfunction measured echocardiographically by transmitral flow velocities. SIRCAT is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00317967).Results: Of 222 screened patients, 22 were randomized evenly to atorvastatin and placebo. The mean age was 47 ± 10 years, and 15 (68%) were male. All subjects completed the protocol. At baseline, LV masses were 197 ± 76 g and 205 ± 82 g in the placebo and atorvastatin groups, respectively. After 12 months treatment, the LV masses in the placebo and atorvastatin groups were 196 ± 80 versus 206 ± 92 g (P = 0.80), respectively. Echocardiographic indices were not different in the two groups at baseline. After 12 months, diastolic dysfunction as assessed using transmitral flow velocities E/E', A/A', and peak systolic mitral velocity showed no benefit from atorvastatin.Conclusions: In patients with HCM, atorvastatin did not cause LV mass regression or improvements in LV diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheldon et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=22). Atorvastatin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass at 12 months as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (p=0.9). In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, atorvastatin 80 mg daily did not cause left ventricular mass regression or improvements in diastolic function compared to placebo over 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: