Key result
Rotaviruses with rearranged genomic RNA segments are preferentially packaged into viral progenies during mixed infections, despite having no selective growth advantage over wild-type rotaviruses.
Rearranged rotavirus RNA segments are preferentially packaged into viral progeny despite not conferring a selective growth advantage in cell culture.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate implications for rotavirus management or vaccines; leaves open mechanistic questions on RNA packaging in mixed infections.
The rotavirus (RV) genome consists of 11 double-stranded RNA segments. Sometimes, partial sequence duplication of an RNA segment leads to a rearranged RNA segment. To specify the impact of rearrangement, the replication efficiencies of human RV with rearranged segments 7, 11 or both were compared to these of the homologous human wild-type RV (wt-RV) and of the bovine wt-RV strain RF. As judged by viral growth curves, rotaviruses with a rearranged genome (r-RV) had no selective growth advantage over the homologous wt-RV. In contrast, r-RV were selected over wt-RV during competitive experiments (i.e mixed infections between r-RV and wt-RV followed by serial passages in cell culture). Moreover, when competitive experiments were performed between a human r-RV and the bovine wt-RV strain RF, which had a clear growth advantage, rearranged segments 7, 11 or both always segregated in viral progenies even when performing mixed infections at an MOI ratio of 1 r-RV to 100 wt-RV. Lastly, bovine reassortant viruses that had inherited a rearranged segment 7 from human r-RV were generated. Although substitution of wt by rearranged segment 7 did not result in any growth advantage, the rearranged segment was selected in the viral progenies resulting from mixed infections by bovine reassortant r-RV and wt-RV, even for an MOI ratio of 1 r-RV to 10(7) wt-RV. Lack of selective growth advantage of r-RV over wt-RV in cell culture suggests a mechanism of preferential packaging of the rearranged segments over their standard counterparts in the viral progeny.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Troupin et al. (2011) studied Rotavirus infection (in vitro). Rotavirus with rearranged genome (r-RV) vs. Wild-type rotavirus (wt-RV) was evaluated on Viral growth kinetics and selection in competitive experiments. Rotaviruses with rearranged genomic RNA segments are preferentially packaged into viral progenies during mixed infections, despite having no selective growth advantage over wild-type rotaviruses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: