Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of a practice analysis defining the knowledge, skills, and abilities expected of entry-level pharmacists and the development of the resultant North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) content outline (CO). METHODS: The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy convened a representative panel of pharmacists (n = 14) to create a practice analysis document and CO. Panel experience, current NAPLEX competency statements, and guiding documents were used in the process. A survey was administered to a large sample of practicing pharmacists to validate the CO and determine final weights for each domain. Respondents selected a relevance rating for the lowest content domain level on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all relevant; 4 = very relevant). Survey results were used to develop the final CO, which was approved by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy to guide NAPLEX development. RESULTS: A practice analysis document was created listing 5 content domains along with the tasks, knowledge, and skills associated with each domain. A total of 1950 pharmacists fully or partially completed the survey and provided relevance ratings for the lowest level of each content domain (n = 54). The mean relevance rating was 3.25 (SD = 0.42; range 2.22 to 3.85), indicating a high degree of relevance for each content domain to practice. A final CO was created, which is used to define content areas to be assessed on the NAPLEX. CONCLUSION: A practice analysis process produced valuable resources for defining the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities for entry-level pharmacists. These resources can be utilized by educators to prepare graduates for the NAPLEX.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: