Key result
Vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) and sitagliptin (25 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing HbA1c (-0.54% vs -0.56%, p=0.874) and were both well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment.
Why the study?
Does vildagliptin compared to sitagliptin improve glycemic control and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment?
RCT (n=148)
Double-blind
Interactive voice response technology (IVRS)
Yes
Does vildagliptin compared to sitagliptin improve glycemic control and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.54% vs -0.56%
p-value: p=0.874
Vildagliptin 50 mg once daily and sitagliptin 25 mg once daily demonstrated similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment.
Supports either DPP-4 inhibitor for glycemic control in severe renal impairment; extends direct head-to-head evidence in this high-risk population.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: There are limited data comparing dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors directly. We compared the safety and efficacy of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment (RI). METHODS: This study was a parallel-arm, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, 24 week study conducted in 87 centres across Brazil and the USA. Patients with type 2 diabetes, either drug naive or treated with any glucose-lowering agents, who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 6.5-10.0% [48-86 mmol/mol]) and an estimated GFR <30 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2) were randomised (via interactive voice response technology) to vildagliptin 50 mg once daily or sitagliptin 25 mg once daily. These doses are recommended in this patient population and considered maximally effective. Participants, investigators and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment. Efficacy endpoints included change in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at all visits and the primary safety endpoint was assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were randomised, 83 to vildagliptin and 65 to sitagliptin. All patients were analysed. After 24 weeks, the adjusted mean change in HbA1c was -0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.52% (59 mmol/mol) with vildagliptin and -0.56% (6.1 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.80% (62 mmol/mol) with sitagliptin (p = 0.874). FPG decreased by 0.47 ± 0.37 mmol/l with vildagliptin and increased by 0.16 ± 0.43 mmol/l with sitagliptin (p = 0.185). Both treatments were well tolerated with overall similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: At their recommended doses for severe RI, vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) compared with sitagliptin (25 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy and both drugs were well tolerated. This study provides further support for the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with severe RI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00616811 (completed) FUNDING: This study was planned and conducted by Novartis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kothny et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment (n=148). Vildagliptin vs. Sitagliptin 25 mg once daily was evaluated on Adjusted mean change in HbA1c at 24 weeks (p=0.874). Vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) and sitagliptin (25 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing HbA1c (-0.54% vs -0.56%, p=0.874) and were both well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: