Key result
Electrogram dispersion-guided ablation is linked to ~63% lower arrhythmia recurrence vs conventional ablation at 18 months.
Why the study?
Intra-cardiac electrograms to guide AF ablation have yielded conflicting results, prompting evaluation of spatio-temporal dispersion as a marker of AF drivers for ablating all forms of AF.
Does ablation guided by spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with drug-refractory AF compared to conventional ablation?
Cohort (n=152)
Yes
Does ablation guided by spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with drug-refractory AF compared to conventional ablation?
Ablation targeting spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion without PVI may offer a highly effective, patient-tailored approach to AF ablation with shorter procedure times.
Background The use of intra-cardiac electrograms to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has yielded conflicting results. We evaluated an electrogram marker of AF drivers: the clustering of electrograms exhibiting spatio-temporal dispersion — regardless of whether such electrograms were fractionated or not. Objective To evaluate the usefulness of spatio-temporal dispersion, a visually recognizable electric footprint of AF drivers, for the ablation of all forms of AF. Methods We prospectively enrolled 105 patients admitted for AF ablation. AF was sequentially mapped in both atria with a 20-pole PentaRay catheter. We tagged and ablated only regions displaying electrogram dispersion during AF. Results were compared to a validation set in which a conventional ablation approach was used (pulmonary vein isolation/stepwise approach). To establish the mechanism underlying spatio-temporal dispersion of AF electrograms, we conducted realistic numerical simulations of AF drivers in a 2-dimensional model and optical mapping of ovine atrial scar-related AF. Results Ablation at dispersion areas terminated AF in 95%. After ablation of 17±10% of the left atrial surface and 18 months of follow-up, the atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate was 15% after 1.4±0.5 procedure/patient vs 41% in the validation set after 1.5±0.5 procedure/patient (arrhythmia free-survival rates: 85% vs 59%, log rank P<0.001). In comparison with the validation set, radiofrequency times (49 ± 21 minutes vs 85 ± 34.5 minutes, p=0.001) and procedure times (168 ± 42 minutes vs. 230 ± 67 minutes, p<.0001) were shorter. In simulations and optical mapping experiments, virtual PentaRay recordings demonstrated that electrogram dispersion is mostly recorded in the vicinity of a driver. Conclusions The clustering of intra-cardiac electrograms exhibiting spatio-temporal dispersion is indicative of AF drivers. Their ablation allows for a non-extensive and patient-tailored approach to AF ablation. Clinical trial.gov number: NCT02093949
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seitz et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=152). Ablation guided by spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion vs. Conventional ablation (pulmonary vein isolation/stepwise approach) was evaluated on Atrial arrhythmia recurrence after 1.4±0.5 procedures at 18 months (p=<0.001). Ablation guided by spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence to 15% compared to 41% with conventional ablation at 18 months (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: