Key result
Oscillometric mean arterial pressure was on average 6.6 mmHg higher (95% CI 5.3-7.9; P<0.001) than intra-radial mean arterial pressure in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine.
Why the study?
Does oscillometric brachial MAP measurement differ from intra-radial MAP measurement in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine?
Observational (n=68)
No
Does oscillometric brachial MAP measurement differ from intra-radial MAP measurement in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine?
In ICU patients receiving norepinephrine, oscillometric brachial MAP is significantly higher than intra-radial MAP, and this difference increases with illness severity, which could influence vasopressor dosing.
May prompt under-treatment if oscillometric MAP guides norepinephrine dosing; leaves open whether intra-arterial monitoring improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine is frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise and maintain an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP). Conflict arises as to which MAP should guide vasopressor dose, as oscillometric MAP in the brachial artery often diverges from intra-radial MAP. We wanted to estimate the magnitude of this difference in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine, and to see whether the patient age, norepinephrine dose, age of radial catheter, ventilation treatment or severity of illness influenced the difference. METHODS: Prospective observational study comparing oscillometric MAP and intra-radial MAP performed in a central hospital-based surgical ICU during the period from February 2002 through to October 2003. Sixty-eight consecutive patients who received a norepinephrine infusion to maintain MAP above 70 mmHg were included. The mean arterial blood pressure was measured both oscillometrically and in the ipsilateral radial artery. RESULTS: Oscillometric MAP was on average 6.6 mmHg higher (95% CI 5.3-7.9) than intra-radial MAP in the 134 sets of measurements (P < 0.001). The patient's age (P = 0.319), norepinephrine dosage (P = 0.959) the age of the radial catheter (P = 0.992) were not significant. The difference in MAP was marginally greater in ventilated patients (P = 0.061) and significantly greater as the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) score increased (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: MAP measured oscillometrically over the brachial artery directly in the radial artery gave different results in an ICU population receiving norepinephrine. In more than one of four patients this difference is so large, and increases with illness severity, that the selection of any one method would influence treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pytte et al. (2006) conducted an observational in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine (n=68). Oscillometric mean arterial pressure measurement vs. Intra-radial mean arterial pressure measurement was evaluated on Difference between oscillometric and intra-radial mean arterial pressure (MD 6.6, 95% CI 5.3-7.9, p=< 0.001). Oscillometric mean arterial pressure was on average 6.6 mmHg higher (95% CI 5.3-7.9; P<0.001) than intra-radial mean arterial pressure in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: