Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
THE microbiology of egg shells and egg packing materials has received inadequate attention. In England, Haines (1938) found levels of bacterial contamination ranging from 1.30×104—8.0×106 (incubation, 20°C.) and 3.5×104–1.6×106 (incubation, 37°C.) on the shells of 130 eggs, the majority of which were procured from a farm. Rosser (1942) reported average counts of 7.0×104 organisms per shell of Canadian market eggs and 1.03×105 per shell of eggs obtained from a farm. Forsythe et al. (1953) found an average of 6.3×104 (range, 1.0×104—1.0×106) microorganisms on the shells of eggs produced on an experimental poultry farm. Haines (1938) examined 100 isolates from shells and found that gram-negative bacteria (38%), bacilli (30%), and gram-positive cocci (25%) were the most prevalent contaminants. He concluded that eggs were exposed to contamination from a wide variety of sources, the chief ones being feces, manure, and soil. The present study was undertaken with the object…
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayres et al. (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: