Key result
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia maintained haemodynamic stability and provided adequate analgesia compared to general anaesthesia in short-duration breast surgeries.
Why the study?
Does thoracic spinal anaesthesia provide effective anaesthesia and haemodynamic stability compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing short-duration breast surgeries?
RCT
Open-label
randomised
Does thoracic spinal anaesthesia provide effective anaesthesia and haemodynamic stability compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing short-duration breast surgeries?
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is defended as a safe and effective open-label alternative to general anaesthesia for short-duration, non-cancer breast surgeries.
Dear Editor We would like to address the queries in response to the comments raised by one of the readers on our published article.[1,2] Blinding requires significant resources, increases the operational complexity of trials and may not always be feasible.[3] To understand and gain confidence in the safety profile of drugs, open-label studies are now increasingly used.[4] We used thoracic spinal anaesthesia for short-duration breast surgeries (≤90 min). Cancer surgeries (or axillary clearance) have not been included, hence the diathermy remark is superfluous. We monitored blood pressure every 5 min. Haemodynamic stability was maintained due to the low dose of local anaesthetic, as also stated by Abdelhamid and Elakany[5] and Khan et al.[6] Intraoperatively, the general anaesthesia group was given adequate analgesia with intravenous fentanyl and nitrous oxide. The rescue analgesic in the postoperative period was intravenous paracetamol (one or more doses, 1 g), which was planned to be given when the visual analogue scale was ≥4. The analgesia employed was not suboptimal. We did not use opioids in the postoperative period for both groups since we wanted to extrapolate the findings to daycare surgery and observe whether the patients were ready for discharge after 24 h for future research. Further studies are required in this direction. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karthik et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in breast surgeries. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia was evaluated. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia maintained haemodynamic stability and provided adequate analgesia compared to general anaesthesia in short-duration breast surgeries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: