Key result
Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia significantly increased the odds of hypotension (OR 12.01) and bradycardia (OR 9.97) compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries.
Why the study?
Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia has been studied as an alternative to general anesthesia, but lacked systematic evaluation and comparison.
Does segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia improve hemodynamic and recovery profiles compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries?
Meta-Analysis (n=394)
Does segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia improve hemodynamic and recovery profiles compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries?
Odds Ratio: 12.01 (95% CI 2.75–52.52)
Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia for upper abdominal and breast surgeries reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves pain control, but significantly increases the risk of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia compared to general anesthesia.
STSA demands vigilant hemodynamic monitoring due to elevated hypotension and bradycardia risk; extends sparse comparative data but leaves optimal use open pending larger trials.
Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) has been described primarily as case reports for performing upper abdominal and thoracic surgeries in significant respiratory comorbid patients. A few comparative studies have recently evaluated the technique as an advantageous alternative to general anesthesia (GA). However, there is no systematic evaluation and comparison of the techniques. The present systematic review evaluated the hemodynamic, comfort, and satisfaction of patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgeries under STSA and GA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar Advanced, and citation tracking were performed to find suitable articles that compared STSA and GA. The primary objective-related data were hypotension and bradycardia. The secondary objective-related data in the context of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), pain, rescue analgesics, sedation requirement, satisfaction, and comfort were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous data on hypotension, bradycardia, and PONV; odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Data of 394 patients from six studies were evaluated. Patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries under STSA had significantly higher odds of hypotension (Fixed-Effect Model OR 12.23, 95% CI 2.81-53.28; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 12.01, 95% CI 2.75-52.52; I2 =0%) and bradycardia (Fixed-Effect Model OR 10.95, 95% CI 2.94-40.74, I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61-38.08; I2 =0%) but lower odds of PONV (Fixed-Effect Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.45; I2 =0%). Most of the patients undergoing STSA were given intravenous sedation to overcome anxiety and discomfort. Overall, patient satisfaction was on par with GA. However, few surgeons were unenthusiastic about the technique while performing axillary clearances due to bothering twitches from cautery. STSA led to early post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and provided better pain control, lowering the need for rescue analgesics and opioid consumption in the first 24-hour postoperative period. STSA is associated with very high odds of hypotension and bradycardia as compared to GA. On the other hand, STSA demonstrated superior pain control, reduced opioid requirements, shorter PACU stays, and significantly reduced risk of PONV. Nevertheless, STSA patients mostly require sedation to make the patient comfortable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karim et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Upper abdominal and breast surgeries (n=394). Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on Hypotension (OR 12.01, 95% CI 2.75-52.52). Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia significantly increased the odds of hypotension (OR 12.01) and bradycardia (OR 9.97) compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: