Key result
Molecular analysis of 33 patients with hepatitis A revealed fecal shedding for at least 33 days and distinct circulating subgenotypes (type IA and IB) among different risk groups in Amsterdam.
Observational (n=33)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Molecular epidemiology demonstrates that distinct HAV subgenotypes circulate among different risk groups in Amsterdam, which may inform national vaccination strategies.
The transmission of sporadic community-acquired hepatitis A virus (HAV) among different risk groups in Amsterdam was verified by applying molecular techniques on fecal samples. These were collected in 1997/1998 from 33 persons with HAV infection that was confirmed serologically. From 8 of these persons serial stool samples were collected. Nested RT-PCR targeting the VP3-VP1 and VP1-P2a regions followed by sequence analysis established the duration of fecal HAV RNA excretion in stool and the epidemiological molecular relationships between patients. The samples of 31 patients were RT-PCR positive, of which 24 were positive for both regions. Fecal HAV shedding was found to occur for at least 33 days after onset of disease, which was the longest time span tested. Sequencing showed that the hepatitis A virus subgenotype circulating among persons from Moroccan descent (type IB) was different from the subgenotype circulating among Dutch homosexual men (type IA). If the latter is endemic in the Netherlands, its presence is of importance to the national vaccination strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruisten et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection (n=33). Community-acquired hepatitis A virus infection was evaluated on Duration of fecal HAV RNA excretion and epidemiological molecular relationships. Molecular analysis of 33 patients with hepatitis A revealed fecal shedding for at least 33 days and distinct circulating subgenotypes (type IA and IB) among different risk groups in Amsterdam.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: