Key result
Prasugrel reduces the short- and long-term risk of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI, but increases the risk of bleeding.
Why the study?
Does prasugrel reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does prasugrel reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prasugrel provides more potent and predictable platelet inhibition than clopidogrel, reducing ischemic events and stent thrombosis in ACS patients undergoing PCI, though it increases bleeding risk.
Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel represents the key treatment strategy for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a broad inter-individual response variability to such treatment strategy, and a considerable number of patients persist with inadequate platelet inhibition, which has been associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. Overall, these findings underscore the need for novel antiplatelet agents able to achieve greater platelet inhibition; this can potentially reduce ischemic event rates. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY 640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y(12) receptor. Laboratory studies have shown prasugrel to be associated with more prompt, potent and predictable degrees of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. In a large-scale clinical study, which was comprised of high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI, prasugrel was shown to significantly reduce the short- and long-term risk of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis. However, such significant reduction in ischemic events occurred at the expense of a higher risk of bleeding. Recent clinical trial data analyses have led to a better understanding of the efficacy and safety of prasugrel. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capranzano et al. (2009) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated. Prasugrel reduces the short- and long-term risk of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI, but increases the risk of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: