Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geometry optimizations of the [Mn{η x -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 } 3 ] - anion and its parent anion [Mn(η x -C 3 H 5 ) 3 ] - in the high-spin or S = 5/2 state at the BP86/AE1 level of theory yielded the mixed hapticity structures [Mn{η 3 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 }{η 1 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 ) 2 }] - and [Mn(η 3 -C 3 H 5 )(η 1 -C 3 H 5 ) 2 ] - ( 1-HS and 2-HS, respectively). These calculations revealed that the silyl substituents in 1-HS have very little influence on the hapticities of the ligands and the asymmetric bonding of the η 3 -bonded ligand, suggesting that these structural features are intrinsic to the complex. Natural population analyses and calculations of Wiberg bond indices for 1-HS indicate predominantly ionic bonding between manganese and the η 3 -bonded ligands, while there is increased covalent character in the bonds to the η 1 -bonded ligands. Investigations of the related intermediate-spin forms of these complexes for which S = 3/2 afford structures of composition [Mn{η 3 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 } 2 {η 1 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 ) }] - ( 1-IS ) and [Mn(η 3 -C 3 H 5 ) 2 (η 1 -C 3 H 5 )] - ( 2-IS ), in which one of the allyl ligands has slipped from an η 1 - to η 3 -bonding mode with a concomitant decrease in the manganese−carbon distances, and which again reveals essentially no dependency of hapticity upon the spatial requirements of the silyl substituents. The relative energies of 1-HS, 1-IS, and the low-spin state 1-LS (for which S = 1/2) at both the BP86/AE1 and B3LYP/AE1 levels of theory revealed 1-HS and 1-LS to be the most and least stable forms of 1, respectively, with the energy of 1-LS being prohibitively high at each level of theory. A reinvestigation of the experimental magnetic susceptibility of the ion-separated species [Li(thf) 4 ][Mn{η 3 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 }{η 1 -(Me 3 Si) 2 C 3 H 3 ) 2 }], [Li(thf) 4 ][ 1 ], yielded a Curie constant that indicated the presence of an S = 3/2 spin state for the Mn(II) ion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Layfield et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: