Key result
Parallel endografting in ch-TEVAR configurations increased radial loads up to fivefold compared to standard TEVAR, with mechanical deformations highly dependent on the specific stent-graft combination.
Why the study?
The structural device-device and device-artery interactions arising during aortic arch parallel endografting (chimney TEVAR) are not well understood.
Does parallel endografting (ch-TEVAR) alter radial loading and mechanical deformation compared to standard TEVAR in a benchtop model?
Does parallel endografting (ch-TEVAR) alter radial loading and mechanical deformation compared to standard TEVAR in a benchtop model?
This benchtop study demonstrates significant variability in radial loads and mechanical deformations between different clinically relevant ch-TEVAR configurations, highlighting the importance of specific device selection.
To manage complex aortic arch disease using minimally invasive techniques, interventionalists have reported the use of multiple stent-graft devices deployed in a parallel configuration. The structural device-device and device-artery interactions arising during aortic arch parallel endografting, also known as chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (ch-TEVAR), is not well understood. Through the use of a radial force testing system we sought to characterise both the loading and deformation behaviour of parallel endografts in representative ch-TEVAR configurations. Four commercially available devices (Bentley BeGraft, Gore TAG, Gore Viabahn, and Medtronic Valiant) were subjected to uniform radial load individually, and in six combinations, to quantify loading profiles. Image data collected during testing were analysed to evaluate mechanical deformations in terms of gutters, chimney and main endograft compression, as well as graft infolding. Parallel endografting was found to increase radial loads when compared to standard TEVAR. Chronic outward force during ch-TEVAR was dependent on main endograft manufacturer, with TAG combinations leading to consistently higher loads than Valiant, but independent of chimney graft type. Endograft deformations were dependent on chimney graft type, with Viabahn combinations presenting with lower gutter areas and increased lumen compression than BeGraft. Chimney graft deformations were also influenced by deployment arrangement in the case of double ch-TEVAR. This study emphasizes the significant variability in both radial loads and mechanical deformations between clinically relevant ch-TEVAR configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwieciński et al. (2020) studied Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (in vitro model). Parallel endografting (ch-TEVAR configurations) vs. Standard TEVAR (single endograft) was evaluated on Chronic outward force (COF) and mechanical deformations (gutter area, graft compression). Parallel endografting in ch-TEVAR configurations increased radial loads up to fivefold compared to standard TEVAR, with mechanical deformations highly dependent on the specific stent-graft combination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: