Key result
Passive volume management profile linked to ~6-point higher symptom distress score in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
To explore latent categories of volume management behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure and analyze their relationship with symptom distress.
Cross-Sectional (n=552)
Yes
Latent profiles of volume management behaviors in chronic heart failure patients independently predict symptom distress, highlighting the need for tailored behavioral interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Latent volume management profiles associate with symptom distress in CHF; hypothesis-generating and requires longitudinal validation before practice implications.
Objective To explore the latent categories of volume management behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and analyze their relationship with symptom distress. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized a convenience sampling method to select 552 CHF patients from the cardiology departments of Nantong Sixth People's Hospital and Nantong Fourth People's Hospital. Volume management behaviors were assessed using the Volume Management Behavior Scale, and symptom distress was evaluated using the Symptom Distress Questionnaire (SDQ), which measures the severity of eight core symptoms. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify behavioral categories. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and multiple linear regression were used to analyze differences in symptom distress across behavioral categories and to examine the independent predictive effect of behavioral classification on symptom distress. Results The volume management behaviors of CHF patients were classified into three latent categories: active management type (43.1%), selective adherence type (27.7%), and passive dependence type (29.2%). Symptom distress scores showed a significant increasing trend across the three categories (active type: 10.5 ± 3.8; selective type: 13.2 ± 4.1; passive type: 16.3 ± 5.2, P < 0.001). After controlling for confounding factors such as age, gender, and NYHA classification, behavioral categories independently explained 41% of the total variance in symptom distress (adjusted R 2 = 0.41, F = 32.17, P < 0.001), with the passive dependence type demonstrating the strongest predictive effect ( β = 5.82, 95% CI: 4.21–7.43). Conclusion CHF patients exhibit three distinct clinical patterns of volume management behaviors, with the passive dependence type associated with the highest symptom burden. Behavioral category is a significant predictor of symptom distress. These findings provide an empirical basis for developing precise intervention strategies tailored to different behavioral phenotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic heart failure (n=552). Passive dependence volume management behavior profile vs. Active management volume management behavior profile was evaluated on Symptom distress score (β 5.82, 95% CI 4.21-7.43, p=<0.001). The passive dependence profile of volume management behavior was independently associated with a 5.82-point higher symptom distress score compared to the active management profile in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: