Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Brucellosis is uncommon in the United States; however, its circulation among wildlife and domestic cattle has been ongoing in Wyoming. To assess the public health threat of brucellosis circulation among animals, a seroprevalence study was undertaken among workers in professions considered to be at the highest risk for infection. METHODS: A seroprevalence study was undertaken targeting individuals in at-risk professions in the affected area of the state. RESULTS: Seroprevalence among study participants was 14.4%. Veterinarians were the main professional group that demonstrated a statistically significant association with measurable anti-Brucella antibodies. Vaccinating animals with Brucella vaccines was associated with seropositivity. CONCLUSION: The risk to the general public's health from the circulation of Brucella among wildlife and cattle can be attributed primarily to a limited subpopulation at high risk rather than a generally elevated risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luce et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: