This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Hepatitis B (HBV) infection affects 4%–14% of people with HIV infection in Turkey. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is highly effective in treatment of HIV infection. While it is active against HBV, data on the use in HIV-HBV co-infection are limited. Patients and Methods We analyzed the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)- and TAF-containing regimens in patients with HIV-HBV co-infection from six centers in Istanbul, Turkey. The results of the cohort of 36 months were presented. Results 259 patients were enrolled: 146 and 113 were receiving TAF- and TDF-containing regimens respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable except TAF-containing group was older; had higher CD4 cell count and lower rate of CD4 count ≤200 cells/μL. Baseline HIV-RNA were 8.2 log copies/mL and 6.8 log in TAF- and TDF-containing groups, respectively ( p = .059) and HBV-DNA levels were 8.1 log IU/mL in both groups. Thirty-eight and 39% of the patients were HBeAg-positive. After 36 months, undetectable HBV-DNA was noted in 88% and 87%, and undetectable HIV-RNA in 85% and in 83% of TAF and TDF-containing groups, respectively. The increase in mean CD4 cell was significant in both groups: Δ = 311 cells/μL in TAF- and Δ = 393 cells/μL in TDF-containing groups. Rates of HBeAg loss (63% vs 57%), HBeAg seroconversion (35% vs 29%), HBsAg loss (29% vs 27%), and HBsAg seroconversion (23% vs 16%) were comparable at 36 months of therapy. Conclusion This real-life study showed that both TAF- and TDF-containing regimens are effective in co-infected patients. The rates of HBsAg loss seemed higher than those in HBV-monoinfected patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: