PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2013Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

Implementation of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

366 primary care physicians (PCPs)

Design

Cross-sectional

Key result

Home blood pressure monitoring was routinely used by 90% of surveyed primary care physicians, although 79% used a higher than recommended threshold for hypertension diagnosis.

Authors

CTChristina TsakiriGSGeorge S. StergiouJBJean‐Marc Boivin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Knowledge gaps in HBPM thresholds persist among primary care physicians; leaves open whether targeted education improves guideline adherence.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=366)

Structured PICO

P
Population
366 primary care physicians surveyed on their implementation of home blood pressure monitoring guidelines.
E
Exposure
Phone survey regarding the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) guidelines
O
Outcome
Implementation practices and knowledge of home blood pressure monitoring guidelines

Although primary care physicians frequently use home blood pressure monitoring, significant gaps in knowledge regarding diagnostic thresholds and device validation indicate a need for further education.

Cite This Study

Tsakiri et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension management (n=366). Home blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Routine use of HBPM for white-coat hypertension, treatment titration, and diagnosis. Home blood pressure monitoring was routinely used by 90% of surveyed primary care physicians, although 79% used a higher than recommended threshold for hypertension diagnosis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a945bbad05beabec064cd83https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2013.764890
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share