Key result
The use of additional proximal cuffs during EVAR did not affect postoperative survival (p=0.58) but was associated with a higher cumulative graft migration rate (p=0.02).
Why the study?
Does the use of additional proximal cuffs during EVAR affect postoperative survival and complications in patients undergoing EVAR?
Observational (n=90)
Does the use of additional proximal cuffs during EVAR affect postoperative survival and complications in patients undergoing EVAR?
p-value: p=0.02
Proximal cuffs are an effective intraoperative adjunct to achieve a proximal seal during EVAR, though they may be associated with an elevated risk of late endograft migration.
Additional proximal cuffs during EVAR were associated with higher migration without survival difference; leaves open optimal use and requires prospective confirmation.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and durability of additional proximal cuffs during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A retrospective review of 90 EVAR patients was conducted. Postoperative survival, proximal sealing zone-related complications, and secondary procedures were analyzed. Additional proximal cuffs were used in 11%. Their use did not affect postoperative survival (p = .58), type I endoleak rate (4.4%; p = .19), or the need for sealing zone-related secondary procedures (6.3%; p = .38) compared with patients without cuff placement but was related to a higher cumulative graft migration rate (2.2% overall p = .02). Two patients (2.5%; p = .79) underwent conversion to open surgery, both for proximal sealing zone-related complications. Application of proximal cuffs appears to be an effective intraoperative adjunctive procedure to achieve a proximal seal during EVAR, with favorable midterm results. However, the risk of late endograft migrations may be elevated in this group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biebl et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=90). Additional proximal cuffs vs. No cuff placement was evaluated on Cumulative graft migration (p=0.02). The use of additional proximal cuffs during EVAR did not affect postoperative survival (p=0.58) but was associated with a higher cumulative graft migration rate (p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: