Key result
Angulated neck anatomy is linked to nearly 3-fold higher persistent T2EL risk after preemptive EVAR embolization.
Why the study?
Preemptive aortic side branch embolization was introduced to reduce type 2 endoleak after EVAR, but mid-term outcomes and factors associated with persistent type 2 endoleak needed evaluation.
What are the risk factors for persistent Type 2 endoleak after preemptive side branch embolization during EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Cohort (n=217)
No
What are the risk factors for persistent Type 2 endoleak after preemptive side branch embolization during EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Odds Ratio: 2.9 (95% CI 1.1–7.66)
p-value: p=0.031
In patients undergoing EVAR with preemptive branch embolization, residual lumbar arteries and an angulated neck are independent predictors of persistent Type 2 endoleak, which is associated with unfavorable sac behavior and increased reintervention.
Aggressive preemptive embolization was associated with higher sac shrinkage and lower T2EL/enlargement rates after EVAR; leaves open whether routine adoption improves long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Type 2 endoleak (T2EL) remains the most frequent complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm and is associated with sac enlargement and late adverse events. Preemptive embolization of aortic side branches has been introduced to reduce its incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of EVAR with preemptive side branch embolization and to identify factors associated with persistent T2EL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 217 patients who underwent EVAR with preemptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries (LAs) at our institution between April 2018 and March 2025. Patient characteristics, aneurysm morphology, and procedural details were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of T2EL during follow-up. Risk factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 43.0 ± 22.6 months, T2EL occurred in 25 patients (11.5%). Sac enlargement ≥5 mm was significantly more frequent in patients with T2EL (36.0% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), while complete sac regression was observed only in the non-T2EL group (22.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.007). Multivariable analysis identified angulated neck (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.10-7.66, P = 0.031) and the number of residual LAs (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.12-2.70, P = 0.013) as independent predictors of T2EL. CONCLUSION: Persistent T2EL after PBE was associated with unfavorable sac behavior and an increased need for reintervention. Residual LAs and angulated neck anatomy were independent predictors of persistent T2EL, suggesting the importance of complete embolization, particularly in patients with angulated neck anatomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizoguchi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=217). Angulated neck anatomy and residual lumbar arteries vs. Absence of these risk factors was evaluated on Occurrence of persistent Type 2 endoleak (T2EL) (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.10-7.66, p=0.031). Angulated neck anatomy (OR 2.90) and the number of residual lumbar arteries (OR 1.74) were independent predictors of persistent type 2 endoleak after preemptive side branch embolization during EVAR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: