Key result
Ten core quality indicators for intensive care medicine were developed and agreed upon by German societies to improve structure, process, and outcome quality in clinical practice.
German intensive care societies have established 10 core quality indicators to standardize and improve the quality of care in ICUs.
May guide ICU quality benchmarking in Germany; leaves open prospective validation of effects on outcomes.
In order to improve quality (of therapy), one has to know, evaluate and make transparent, one's own daily processes. This process of reflection can be supported by the presentation of key data or indicators, in which the real as-is state can be represented. Quality indicators are required in order to depict the as-is state.Quality indicators reflect adherence to specific quality measures. Continuing registration of an indicator is useless once it becomes irrelevant or adherence is 100%. In the field of intensive care medicine, studies of quality indicators have been performed in some countries. Quality indicators relevant for medical quality and outcome in critically ill patients have been identified by following standardized approaches.Different German societies of intensive care medicine have finally agreed on 10 core quality indicators that will be valid for two years and are currently recommended in German intensive care units (ICUs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braun et al. (2010) conducted a review in Critically ill patients in intensive care units. 10 core quality indicators was evaluated. Ten core quality indicators for intensive care medicine were developed and agreed upon by German societies to improve structure, process, and outcome quality in clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: