Key result
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) demonstrates clinical equipoise compared with open aneurysm repair, though it has become the predominant approach in the United States.
Why the study?
Does endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) improve outcomes compared to open aneurysm repair (OAR) in patients requiring elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair?
Does endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) improve outcomes compared to open aneurysm repair (OAR) in patients requiring elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair?
This review highlights the necessity of individualizing the choice between EVAR and OAR for AAA repair based on patient-specific clinical and anatomic variables.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized EVAR versus OAR selection; leaves open durability questions in contemporary cohorts.
Randomized clinical trials have documented clinical equipoise when comparing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with open aneurysm repair (OAR). Studies using large administrative databases in the United States have documented a trend whereby the majority of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the United States are being repaired using endovascular techniques. However, few specific guidelines, outside of anatomic criteria for EVAR, exist to aid the physician in determining which approach is best for the individual patient. Variables to be considered in order to determine which approach is best for the patient who requires an AAA repair include age and comorbidities, arterial anatomy, and provider characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Upchurch et al. (2009) conducted a review in Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. Open aneurysm repair (OAR) was evaluated. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) demonstrates clinical equipoise compared with open aneurysm repair, though it has become the predominant approach in the United States.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: