Key result
Among infants undergoing anaesthesia in Nordic countries, perioperative critical events requiring intervention occurred in 43% of cases, with 30-day morbidity and mortality similar to the European cohort.
Why the study?
Following the European NECTARINE study, this analysis sought to describe anaesthetic practices in Nordic countries and compare morbidity and mortality with the overall European cohort.
Does the incidence of critical events and morbidity/mortality in infants undergoing anesthesia in Nordic countries differ from the overall European cohort?
Observational (n=447)
Yes
Does the incidence of critical events and morbidity/mortality in infants undergoing anesthesia in Nordic countries differ from the overall European cohort?
In Nordic countries, anesthesia in young infants is associated with a high rate of perioperative critical events (43%), though 30-day morbidity and mortality are comparable to the broader European cohort.
High critical event rate in Nordic infant anesthesia warrants vigilance; leaves open whether regional factors meaningfully affect 30-day outcomes versus Europe.
INTRODUCTION: The neonate and children audit of anaesthesia practice in Europe (NECTARINE) prospective observational study reported an incidence of 35.2% of critical events requiring intervention during 6542 anaesthetics in 5609 infants up to 60 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) from 165 centres in 31 European countries. METHODS: Sub-analysis of the cohort from the Nordic countries (8% of the entire cohort) was conducted. Secondary aims were to describe the Nordic countries' anaesthetic practices and compare morbidity and mortality with the overall European cohort. RESULTS: Eleven Nordic centres recruited 447 infants (66% males, 37.3% born preterm and 45% had congenital anomalies) undergoing anaesthesia for 530 surgical or non-surgical procedures at 25-60 weeks PMA. Perioperative critical events triggered interventions in 228/530 (43%) cases. Hypotension (12.6%) or hypoxaemia (11.7%) were more common in younger patients and those with co-morbidities. Hypo/hypercapnia occurred in 1.5%/4.7% of cases. More than two attempts for intubation were required in 13 (2.9%) infants (max three attempts). Distribution of ASA-Physical Status Scores was similar to the total European cohort (40% was ASA > 2). A total of 236/530 (44.5%) patients were admitted to the postoperative intensive care unit. Thirty-day morbidity (complications in 87/447 = 19.5%) and mortality (8/447, 1.8%) did not differ from the overall European cohort. Hospital re-admissions were significant up to 90 days (98/447 = 21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In Nordic countries, anaesthesia in young infant children is resource-demanding, and perioperative critical events and co-morbidities are common. Thirty-day morbidity and mortality data in the Nordic countries did not differ from the overall European cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Infants undergoing anaesthesia for surgical or non-surgical procedures (n=447). Anaesthesia vs. Overall European cohort was evaluated on Perioperative critical events requiring intervention. Among infants undergoing anaesthesia in Nordic countries, perioperative critical events requiring intervention occurred in 43% of cases, with 30-day morbidity and mortality similar to the European cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: