Key result
The HUAWEI WATCH D smartwatch accurately measured resting blood pressure, with a mean systolic blood pressure difference of -0.683 mmHg compared to a gold standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Why the study?
Conventional blood pressure meters are limited in real-time monitoring of abnormal blood pressure, prompting the development and validation of a multifunctional smartwatch sphygmomanometer.
Does a multifunction smartwatch sphygmomanometer accurately measure blood pressure compared to gold standard clinical sphygmomanometers in adult subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=361)
Single-blind
No
Does a multifunction smartwatch sphygmomanometer accurately measure blood pressure compared to gold standard clinical sphygmomanometers in adult subjects?
Mean Difference: -0.683
p-value: p=0.723
The multifunction smartwatch sphygmomanometer provides accurate resting and ambulatory blood pressure measurements consistent with clinical gold standards.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most modifiable factor associated with cardiovascular events and complications. The conventional blood pressure (BP) meter method is simple but is limited in terms of real-time monitoring abnormal BP. Therefore, the development of a multifunction smartwatch (HUAWEI WATCH D) sphygmomanometer could significantly improve integrated BP monitoring. METHODS: We enrolled 361 subjects from Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China to validate the accuracy of the smartwatch versatile sphygmomanometer using ISO 81060-2:2018. Resting and ambulatory BP accuracy of the smartwatch were compared with gold standard clinical sphygmomanometers using ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines, the accuracy of 24 h systolic blood pressure (SBP) circadian rhythm monitoring, and diurnal high SBP alert for this smartwatch were assessed using a confusion matrix approach. Additionally, we analyzed online users of different ages for compliance. RESULTS: = 0.065). All data complied with ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines (mean ≤ ±5 mmHg and standard deviation ≤ ±8 mmHg) with no significant differences. Positive predictive values (PPV) of resting SBP and DBP were 0.635 and 0.671, respectively. The PPV of ambulatory SBP and DBP were 0.686. Also, 24 h SBP circadian rhythm monitoring was performed in 107 subjects: accuracy = 0.850, specificity = 0.864, precision/PPV = 0.833, sensitivity = 0.833, and F1-measure (F1) = 0.833. The accuracy, specificity, precision, sensitivity, and F1 values in 85 subjects undergoing diurnal high SBP alerting were 0.858, 0.876, 0.706, 0.809, and 0.754, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with the gold standard clinical sphygmomanometer, smartwatch results were consistent and accurate. Online user feedback showed that elderly individuals cared more about BP monitoring accuracy, with better compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension / Blood pressure monitoring (n=361). HUAWEI WATCH D smartwatch vs. Mercury and automatic oscillometric sphygmomanometers was evaluated on Mean difference in resting systolic blood pressure between smartwatch and mercury sphygmomanometer (MD -0.683 mmHg, p=0.723). The HUAWEI WATCH D smartwatch accurately measured resting blood pressure, with a mean systolic blood pressure difference of -0.683 mmHg compared to a gold standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: