Key result
This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the optimal target mean arterial pressure in critically ill adults with vasodilatory shock; no results are reported.
Why the study?
The optimal mean arterial pressure target for better outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock remains debated, balancing hypotension control against catecholamine adverse effects.
Does a specific target mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduce all-cause mortality in critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock?
Systematic Review
Does a specific target mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduce all-cause mortality in critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock?
This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the optimal target mean arterial pressure in critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock.
Optimal MAP targets in vasodilatory shock remain unresolved; protocol will meta-analyze RCTs to inform resuscitation guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: The optimal target of mean arterial pressure (MAP) for better outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock remains a matter of debate. Although catecholamines are generally used to maintain target blood pressure in hypotensive patients with vasodilatory shock, the adverse effects of catecholamines must also be considered. We will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the certainty of evidence determining the optimal target of MAP control for patients with vasodilatory shock in critically ill settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. We will include only RCTs that evaluated the two different comparators for target MAP to be maintained for clinical outcomes of all-cause mortality: organ dysfunction and adverse events in critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock. We will search the electronic bibliographic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in November 2020. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool. If pooling is appropriate, we will calculate relative risks with 95% CIs for all outcome measures. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. Overall certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not involve primary data collection, and formal ethics approval will therefore not be required. We aim to publish this systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000042624.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukui et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in vasodilatory shock. Target mean arterial pressure (MAP) vs. Different target MAP was evaluated on all-cause mortality, organ dysfunction and adverse events. This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the optimal target mean arterial pressure in critically ill adults with vasodilatory shock; no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: