Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2025IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

The proposed STC-rPPG network achieved high accuracy for remote heart rate estimation, with mean absolute errors of 0.23 bpm and 0.49 bpm on the PURE and UBFC-rPPG datasets, respectively.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Facial videos from the PURE and UBFC-rPPG datasets

Comparison

STC-rPPG network vs existing state-of-the-art models

Key result

The proposed STC-rPPG network achieved high accuracy for remote heart rate estimation, with mean absolute errors of 0.23 bpm and 0.49 bpm on the PURE and UBFC-rPPG datasets, respectively.

Authors

LLLiyuan LinLWLeguang WangYZYiran Zhang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

STC-rPPG may improve remote heart rate estimation; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Facial videos from the PURE and UBFC-rPPG datasets
I
Intervention
STC-rPPG network (spatiotemporal-channel feature collaborative learning)
C
Comparator
Existing state-of-the-art models
O
Outcome
Heart rate estimation accuracy (mean absolute error and root mean square error)surrogate

The proposed STC-rPPG network improves remote heart rate estimation accuracy from facial videos by effectively modeling spatiotemporal dynamics and inter-channel correlations.

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2025) studied Heart rate estimation. STC-rPPG network vs. Existing state-of-the-art models was evaluated on Heart rate estimation accuracy (MAE and RMSE). The proposed STC-rPPG network achieved high accuracy for remote heart rate estimation, with mean absolute errors of 0.23 bpm and 0.49 bpm on the PURE and UBFC-rPPG datasets, respectively.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a94645abeb4e1ebf564cf1dhttps://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3613915
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share