Why the study?
Does compliance with clinically recommended interventions improve symptoms and muscle function in patients with post-polio sequelae?
Does compliance with clinically recommended interventions improve symptoms and muscle function in patients with post-polio sequelae?
Compliance with recommended interventions in post-polio syndrome is associated with improved symptoms and preservation of muscle function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May preserve muscle function in post-polio syndrome; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
In this study of 77 patients with post-polio sequelae (PPS), symptoms and manual test scores on initial evaluation were compared with those at subsequent follow-up evaluations. Patients were divided into three groups based on the degree to which they had complied with clinically recommended interventions: compliers, partial compliers, and noncompliers. At the end of the follow-up period (2.2 +/- 1.2 years), the mean muscle function scores of the entire study group had declined -1.5%, which represented a decline of -0.7% annually. On follow-up evaluations, the complier group had realized an improvement or resolution of post-polio symptoms, and also an improvement in muscle function of +0.6% annually. The partial complier group had realized either no improvement, or improvement in post-polio symptoms, but showed a further decline in muscle function of -3.0%, or an annual decline of -1.3%. The noncomplier group showed either no change, or a worsening of post-polio symptoms, and also showed a further decline in muscle function of -4.1%, which represented an annual decline of -2.0%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peach et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: