Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Georgia leads the nation in both pine tree (Pinus spp.) timber volume and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) ha harvested annually. Off-target movement of pine forest herbicides into peanut fields can occur from aerial applications. Research was conducted from 2020-2022 in Ty Ty, Georgia to determine peanut response to imazapyr from preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) applications. Imazapyr was applied to peanut (cv. Georgia-06G) at the following timings and rates: PRE (1 day after planting) (DAP), 30 DAP, and 60 DAP; and 420 (1X, manufacturers suggested use rate), 84 (1/5X), 42 (1/10X) and 4.2 g ai/ha (1/100X). Peanut density was not reduced by any PRE application of imazapyr. Significant stunting, chlorosis, and reductions in peanut plant height and width occurred from 420 g ai/ha, regardless of application timing. Peanut was more susceptible to imazapyr injury from PRE applications, as peanut heights were reduced by rates ≥ 42 g ai/ha and peanut widths were reduced by rates ≥ 84 g ai/ha. With POST applications, only 420 g ai/ha resulted in plant height and width reductions of 66% and 48% when applied 30 DAP. Peanut treated at 60 DAP had 30% and 57% height reductions with rates of 84 and 420 g ai/ha, respectively. The 420 g ai/ha rate resulted in yield losses of 79%, 66%, and 56% when applied PRE, 30 DAP, and 60 DAP, respectively. PRE applications of imazapyr at 42 or 84 g ai/ha resulted in 31% and 59% yield reductions, respectively. These results suggest that peanut should not be planted to fields exposed to full rates of imazapyr until rates decline to < 42 g ai/ha (~three half-lives or 426 d). Peanut exposed to POST applied imazapyr ≤ 84 g ai/ha (1/5X) during the growing season should not result in significant yield losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbott et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: