No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jul 1955The Results of Ureteral Transplantation to a Rectosigmoidal Pouch William F. Melick and Joseph J. Naryka William F. MelickWilliam F. Melick More articles by this author and Joseph J. NarykaJoseph J. Naryka More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67242-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1955 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEl-Mekresh M, Shehab El-Din A, Fayed S, Brevinge H, Kock N and Ghoneim M (2018) Bladder Substitutes Controlled by the Anal Sphincter: A Comparison of the Different Absorption PotentialsJournal of Urology, VOL. 146, NO. 4, (970-972), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1991.Rabinowitz R, O’donnell W, King L and Moore J (2018) Vesicorectostomy RevisitedJournal of Urology, VOL. 116, NO. 1, (32-35), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1976.Martin L (2018) Uroepithelial Lined Ileal Segment as A Bladder Replacement: Experimental Observations and Brief Review of LiteratureJournal of Urology, VOL. 82, NO. 6, (633-650), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1959.Prentiss R, Mullenix R and Feeney M (2018) Ureteral Implantation: Clinical ExperiencesJournal of Urology, VOL. 77, NO. 4, (600-613), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1957. Volume 74Issue 1July 1955Page: 47-58 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1955 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information William F. Melick More articles by this author Joseph J. Naryka More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melick et al. (1955) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: