Key result
Most health economic evaluations of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening employed optimistic assumptions, suggesting that reported cost-effectiveness ratios are likely too low.
Why the study?
Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective in elderly men?
Systematic Review (n=16)
Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective in elderly men?
This systematic review highlights that current economic models likely overestimate the cost-effectiveness of AAA screening in elderly men by relying on overly optimistic assumptions regarding long-term survival, quality of life, and costs.
Urges caution on AAA screening cost-effectiveness claims; challenges prior economic models relying on optimistic assumptions.
BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1-2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ehlers et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=16). Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm vs. No systematic screening strategy was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Most health economic evaluations of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening employed optimistic assumptions, suggesting that reported cost-effectiveness ratios are likely too low.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: