Key result
Validated methods such as POSSUM scoring and Bayes analysis can accurately describe risk-adjusted outcomes in arterial surgery, providing a fair method for surgeons to collate and compare performance.
Surgeons should actively participate in data collection and risk-adjusted outcome analysis, such as through the National Vascular Database, to ensure fair assessment of surgical performance.
Surgeons are under pressure from both patients and politicians to supply outcome data. The reporting of crude mortality rates by third parties is both unfair and divisive. Validated methods exist to describe risk-adjusted outcomes in arterial surgery, but surgeons will need to become more involved in data collection and analysis. The Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland has started a process of data collection - the National Vascular Database - that could be used by individuals to collate and compare their surgical outcomes. Monitoring outcomes and managing the results could become one of the principal roles of a specialist society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J J Earnshaw (2003) conducted a review in Vascular disease requiring surgery. Risk-adjusted clinical outcomes audit was evaluated. Validated methods such as POSSUM scoring and Bayes analysis can accurately describe risk-adjusted outcomes in arterial surgery, providing a fair method for surgeons to collate and compare performance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: