Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 8, 2014British journal of surgeryOpen Access

Publication of surgeon-specific outcomes

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Compulsory institutional reporting should replace the publication of surgeon-specific outcomes.

Design

Editorial

Authors

DADerek AldersonThe Honourable Society of Lincoln's InnDCDavid CromwellNational Audit Office

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Shifts focus from individual to system-level accountability in surgical outcomes; leaves open optimal implementation and effects on practice.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Alderson et al. (2014) studied this question. Publication of surgeon-specific outcomes should transition to compulsory institutional reporting.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0af79d80d186fca85cee18https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9641
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trends in Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for High-Risk Surgery2011 · 1,406 citations
  2. 2Should Operations Be Regionalized?1979 · 1,769 citations
  3. 3Understanding the Volume-Outcome Effect in Cardiovascular Surgery2013 · 265 citations
  4. 4Surgeons’ Perceptions of Public Reporting of Hospital and Individual Surgeon Quality2013 · 45 citations
  5. 5Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality2012 · 327 citations