Key result
A fly model expressing CCUG-repeat expansions recapitulated key features of human DM2, and expression of MBNL1 isoforms led to cleavage and upregulation of RNA-repeat transcripts.
This fly model of DM2 reveals a novel interaction mechanism where MBNL1 isoforms cause cleavage and upregulation of pathogenic RNA repeat transcripts.
Fly model enables DM2 mechanism studies; leaves open whether MBNL1 modulation will translate to patients.
Expanded non-coding RNA repeats of CUG and CCUG are the underlying genetic causes for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), respectively. A gain-of-function of these pathogenic repeat expansions is mediated at least in part by their abnormal interactions with RNA-binding proteins such as MBNL1 and resultant loss of activity of these proteins. To study pathogenic mechanisms of CCUG-repeat expansions in an animal model, we created a fly model of DM2 that expresses pure, uninterrupted CCUG-repeat expansions ranging from 16 to 720 repeats in length. We show that this fly model for DM2 recapitulates key features of human DM2 including RNA repeat-induced toxicity, ribonuclear foci formation and changes in alternative splicing. Interestingly, expression of two isoforms of MBNL1, MBNL135 and MBNL140, leads to cleavage and concurrent upregulation of the levels of the RNA-repeat transcripts, with MBNL140 having more significant effects than MBNL135. This property is shared with a fly CUG-repeat expansion model. Our results suggest a novel mechanism for interaction between the pathogenic RNA repeat expansions of myotonic dystrophy and MBNL1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2014) studied Myotonic dystrophy type 2. CCUG-repeat expansions and MBNL1 isoforms was evaluated on RNA repeat-induced toxicity, ribonuclear foci formation and changes in alternative splicing. A fly model expressing CCUG-repeat expansions recapitulated key features of human DM2, and expression of MBNL1 isoforms led to cleavage and upregulation of RNA-repeat transcripts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: