Key result
A cardiac PET scan successfully identified small coronary vessel involvement in a 45-year-old man with recurrent typical angina pectoris and normal coronary angiography.
Why the study?
In patients with microvascular angina, symptoms might be recurrent and persistent despite normal coronary vessel evaluations.
Case Report (n=1)
Cardiac PET imaging can identify microvascular angina in patients with recurrent typical angina and normal coronary angiography.
Evaluation for MVA merits consideration in recurrent chest pain with normal angiography; leaves open optimal management strategies.
Key Clinical Message: Microvascular angina (MVA) can present with recurrent chest pain and normal coronary angiography. Recognizing MVA is crucial as it significantly impacts patient morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and management with antianginal medications are essential for improving outcomes and quality of life. Abstract: Cardiovascular diseases are still the main cause of death in many parts of the world. Chest pain and dyspnea are always concerning due to the implications of cardiovascular disease. However, in patients with the involvement of the small coronary vessels (Microvascular Angina), symptoms might be recurrent and persistent despite the presence of normal coronary vessel evaluations. A 45-year-old man with a 25-year smoking history presented with recurrent chest pain, especially during physical activity, and mild shortness of breath. He was admitted, and a coronary angiography the next day appeared normal. However, a cardiac PET scan revealed the involvement of small coronary vessels not visible on angiography. The Patient was a 45-year-old man who presented with recurrent chest pain, more prominent during physical activity. He also had mild shortness of breath. The patient was admitted, and the next day, he underwent normal coronary angiography. The cardiac positron emission tomography (PET scan) showed the involvement of small coronary vessels that were not obvious on angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taheri et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Microvascular angina (n=1). Cardiac PET scan vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of microvascular angina. A cardiac PET scan successfully identified small coronary vessel involvement in a 45-year-old man with recurrent typical angina pectoris and normal coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: