Key result
Non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement using a finger-cuff device showed poor reliability compared to invasive measurement in SAH patients (ICC for mean ABP 0.34; 95% CI 0.14-0.52).
Why the study?
Invasive arterial blood pressure measurement carries complications, prompting investigation into the reliability of risk-free non-invasive finger-cuff volume-clamp measurement compared to invasive arterial catheterization in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Does non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement using a finger-cuff volume-clamp device reliably estimate invasive arterial blood pressure in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage?
Observational (n=30)
Does non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement using a finger-cuff volume-clamp device reliably estimate invasive arterial blood pressure in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage?
Non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement using a finger-cuff volume-clamp device shows poor reliability in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and cannot replace invasive measurement.
Caution against replacing invasive ABP monitoring with finger-cuff devices in aSAH; leaves open reliability questions for prospective validation.
Objective . Invasively measured arterial blood pressure (ABP) is associated with complications, while non-invasively measured ABP is generally considered risk-free. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of non-invasive ABP measured using finger-cuff volume-clamp device compared to invasive ABP measured by an arterial catheter in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Approach . In 30 patients admitted for neurointensive care with SAH, invasive and non-invasive ABP were recorded simultaneously. Reliability was assessed for mean, diastolic and systolic ABP separately using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement for each full period and each 3 s average. Main results. A median of 3 (IQR: 2–3) periods were included for each participant. The full periods ( n = 81) showed an ICC of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.14–0.52), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10–0.49), and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.00–0.39) for mean, diastolic, and systolic ABP, respectively. Three-second averages ( n = 33 786) for mean (ICC: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.33–0.36), diastolic (ICC: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.25–0.28), and systolic ABP (ICC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18–0.33) yielded similar findings. Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed an R 2 of 0.15 ( p < 0.001), 0.15 ( p < 0.001), 0.06 ( p = 0.027) for mean, diastolic and systolic ABP, respectively. Significance. In patients with SAH, non-invasive measurement of ABP using the widely used Nano system from Finapres Medical Systems—a finger-cuff volume-clamp device (Finapres, Chennai, India) showed poor reliability and therefore cannot be used interchangeably with invasively measured ABP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (n=30). Non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement (finger-cuff volume-clamp device) vs. Invasive arterial blood pressure measurement (arterial catheter) was evaluated on Reliability of mean arterial blood pressure (ICC agreement for full periods) (ICC 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.52, p=<0.001). Non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement using a finger-cuff device showed poor reliability compared to invasive measurement in SAH patients (ICC for mean ABP 0.34; 95% CI 0.14-0.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: