Key result
A new wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring system showed acceptable agreement with invasive radial artery measurement (mean difference for SAP -2.09±5.39 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does a new wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring system provide accurate measurements compared to invasive radial artery measurement in patients undergoing elective surgery?
Population
60 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia
Comparison
New wrist continuous noninvasive arterial… vs Invasive arterial pressure monitoring via…
Design
RCT, One-side arm in each patient was selected randomly to assess the new…
Authors
Loading...
Supports wrist CNAP adoption for continuous monitoring in elective surgery; extends validation of noninvasive devices versus invasive standards.
RCT (n=60)
Randomized
Does a new wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring system provide accurate measurements compared to invasive radial artery measurement in patients undergoing elective surgery?
Mean Difference: -2.09
A new wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring system demonstrated acceptable agreement and interchangeability with invasive radial artery monitoring in patients undergoing elective surgery.
Li et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Elective surgery under general anesthesia (n=60). Wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring system vs. Invasive arterial pressure (IAP) monitoring was evaluated on Agreement between measurement methods (wrist CNAP vs IAP) (MD for SAP -2.09 mmHg). A new wrist continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring system showed acceptable agreement with invasive radial artery measurement (mean difference for SAP -2.09±5.39 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: