Key result
Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring showed unsatisfactory precision for detecting peak and nadir systolic pressures compared to invasive monitoring (biases 5 and -7 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does CNAP continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring accurately detect minimal and maximal arterial pressures compared to invasive radial artery monitoring in patients undergoing general anaesthesia?
Observational (n=52)
Does CNAP continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring accurately detect minimal and maximal arterial pressures compared to invasive radial artery monitoring in patients undergoing general anaesthesia?
CNAP non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring lacks sufficient precision to reliably replace invasive radial artery monitoring for detecting extreme blood pressure changes during anesthesia induction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CNAP may not reliably detect extreme systolic pressures under anesthesia; leaves open its comparative utility pending larger prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: CNAP(®) provides continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (AP) monitoring. We assessed its ability to detect minimal and maximal APs during induction of general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Invasive pressure monitoring was established at the radial artery, and CNAP monitoring using a finger sensor recording was begun before induction. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Patients' median age was 67 years [interquartile range (59-76)], median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 [interquartile range (2-3)]. Bias was 5 and -7 mmHg for peak and nadir systolic AP (SAP), with upper and lower limits of agreement of (42:-32) and (27;-42), respectively. The corresponding ICC values were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.57-0.84] and 0.60 (95% CI = 0.44-0.73). Time lags to reach these values were 7.5 s (95% CI = -10.0 to 60.0) for the highest SAP and 10 s (95% CI = -12.5 to 72.5) for the lowest SAP. Bias, lower and upper limits of agreement for diastolic, and mean AP were -14 (-36 to 9) and -12 (-37 to 13) for the nadir value and -7 (-29 to 15) and -2 (-28 to 25) for the peak value. CONCLUSIONS: The CNAP monitor could detect acute change in AP within a reasonable time lag. Precision of its measurements is not satisfactory, and therefore, it could only serve as a clue to the occurrence of changes in AP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gayat et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Surgery under general anaesthesia (n=52). CNAP monitoring vs. Invasive pressure monitoring (radial artery) was evaluated on Peak and nadir systolic arterial pressure (SAP) (ICC 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.84). Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring showed unsatisfactory precision for detecting peak and nadir systolic pressures compared to invasive monitoring (biases 5 and -7 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: