Key result
In patients with diabetes and hypertension, the left common carotid artery had higher intimal-medial thickness and lumen diameter compared to the right.
Why the study?
Differences between right and left carotid blood flow and IMT have been reported alongside hemispheric differences in nonlacunar stroke, but whether differences exist between sides across age groups in patients with diabetes and hypertension was unknown.
Cross-Sectional (n=250)
Significant differences exist in lumen diameter and intimal-medial thickness between the right and left carotid arteries in patients with diabetes and hypertension, which may be attributed to anatomic variations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant bilateral carotid assessment in diabetes and hypertension; leaves open whether side-specific values improve risk stratification.
Introduction: Age, hypertension, and diabetes can cause significant alterations in arterial structure and function, including changes in lumen diameter (LD), intimal-medial thickness (IMT), flow velocities, and arterial compliance. These are also considered risk markers of atherosclerosis and cerebrovascular disease. A difference between right and left carotid artery blood flow and IMT has been reported by some researchers, and a difference in the incidence of nonlacunar stroke has been reported between the right and left brain hemispheres. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences between the right and left common carotid arteries and internal carotid arteries in patients with hypertension and diabetes for 2 age groups. Methods: We studied 250 patients with both diabetes and hypertension. Patients were divided into 2 age groups with the old age group being 56 to 75 years and the young age group 35 to 55 years. The bilateral common carotid and internal carotid arteries were evaluated with B-mode ultrasound and Doppler examinations. The LD and IMT were measured for both common carotid arteries, and spectral waveform parameters and indices were recorded for both internal carotid arteries. Results: The difference in LD between the left and right common carotid arteries for the old age group was 11.64% and for the young age group was 6.42%, with significant P values of <.05 for both age groups. The difference in IMT between the left and right common carotid arteries was 18.27% in the old age group compared with 15.38% in the young age group, with significant P values of <.05. There was a difference in peak systolic velocity between the left and right internal carotid arteries of 4.85% in the old age group which was not significant, compared with 14.28% in the young age group with a significant P value <.05, whereas the difference in end-diastolic velocity between the left and right internal carotid arteries was not significant for both age groups. Differences between the right and left internal carotid arteries for resistive index, pulsatility index, and pressure gradient were significant only in the young age group. Conclusion: We found significant differences between the right and left common carotid and internal carotid arteries in patients with diabetes and hypertension which were more prominent in the young age group. Values for common carotid IMT and LD were significantly higher in the left common carotid artery versus the right common carotid artery in both age groups. Differences between the 2 carotid sides may be attributed to anatomic variations in the common carotid artery origins which lead to differences in stress between the 2 sides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Sabbagh et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes and hypertension (n=250). Left carotid artery vs. Right carotid artery was evaluated on Difference in lumen diameter (LD) and intimal-medial thickness (IMT) between left and right common carotid arteries (p=<.05). In patients with diabetes and hypertension, the left common carotid artery had higher intimal-medial thickness and lumen diameter compared to the right.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: