Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Induction by the 4-quinolone group of antibacterial drugs of the umuC gene, the SOS function most involved in error-prone DNA repair (together with umuD), was assessed in a strain of Escherichia coli harbouring a umuC::lacZ gene fusion. All 4-quinolones tested induced this umuC::lacZ fusion, with maximum induction at 4-quinolone concentrations close to their minimum inhibitory concentrations for this strain, and the SOS Inducing Potential (SOSIP) was closely related to antibacterial activity. Mitomycin C, a known mutagen, was a slightly better inducer (in terms of SOSIP) than any of the quinolones. In contrast, induction by 4-quinolones of the sfiA (sulA) gene, an SOS function involved in cell division inhibition, was better than induction by mitomycin C in an E. coli strain harbouring an sfiA::lacZ gene fusion. The umuC gene fusion was induced at lower concentrations of 4-quinolone than was the sfiA gene fusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Power et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: