Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The transduction mechanism of salt-induced responses of mouse taste cells was investigated using the patch clamp and the local stimulation techniques under quasi-natural conditions. Apically applied NaCl induced a voltage-independent current, which was partially suppressed by amiloride and Cd2+. In contrast, apically applied 0.5 M KCl induced an inwardly rectifying current (KCl-induced Iir). The KCl-induced Iir was unaffected by amiloride. The Iir was suppressed not only by external Ba2+ and Cs+, but also by a Cl- channel blocker, niflumic acid. The Er of the KCl-induced response was independent of the apical ionic concentration, but rather was close to the equilibrium potential of Cl- (E(Cl)) at the basolateral membrane. The KCl-induced Iir displayed a fast run-down under the conditions of the conventional whole cell clamp method, but not under the perforated patch conditions. Immunohistochemical localization of an inwardly rectifying Cl- channel protein, ClC-2, was observed in taste bud cells of the fungiform papillae. It is concluded that the transduction mechanism of NaCl-induced responses is completely different from that of KCl-induced responses in mouse taste cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tatsuki Miyamoto (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: