Key result
Outpatients with poliomyelitis sequelae maintained high independence in personal ADL despite perceived difficulties, though >50% were dependent for cleaning, shopping, and transportation.
Cross-Sectional (n=133)
Patients with poliomyelitis sequelae try to maintain independence despite perceived difficulties in daily activities and may be reluctant to use assistive devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports IADL assessments in polio sequelae outpatients; leaves open optimal rehabilitation strategies.
Polio involvement and its relation to ability in terms of independence and perceived difficulty in activities in daily living (ADL) were studied in outpatients (median age 57 years) with poliomyelitis sequelae (n = 133). The use and need of assistive devices and housing conditions were recorded. The subjects had a high degree of independence in personal ADL, whereas more than 50% were dependent on cleaning, shopping and transportation. A considerable number of subjects independent in ADL reported difficulties in daily activities. The majority of interventions in the form of housing adaptation and assistive devices were provided for persons severely weakened by polio. Ratings of perceived difficulty indicated need of interventions to prevent overload and increased dependence in ADL. However, about half of the recommended mobility assistive devices were rejected. The results indicate that polio subjects try to maintain their independence despite perceived difficulties and may be reluctant to use assistive devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2001 study conducted a cross-sectional in Poliomyelitis sequelae (n=133). Poliomyelitis sequelae was evaluated on Independence and perceived difficulty in activities in daily living (ADL). Outpatients with poliomyelitis sequelae maintained high independence in personal ADL despite perceived difficulties, though >50% were dependent for cleaning, shopping, and transportation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: